<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Considering a new browser? Browser Speed Tests: Firefox 3.6, Chrome 4, Opera 10.5, and Extensions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.s8080blog.com/2010/01/considering-a-new-browser-browser-speed-tests-firefox-3-6-chrome-4-opera-10-5-and-extensions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.s8080blog.com/2010/01/considering-a-new-browser-browser-speed-tests-firefox-3-6-chrome-4-opera-10-5-and-extensions/</link>
	<description>Some of our latest digital releases.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 15:36:59 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Iestyn Pugh</title>
		<link>http://www.s8080blog.com/2010/01/considering-a-new-browser-browser-speed-tests-firefox-3-6-chrome-4-opera-10-5-and-extensions/comment-page-1/#comment-3348</link>
		<dc:creator>Iestyn Pugh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 19:30:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.s8080blog.com/2010/01/considering-a-new-browser-browser-speed-tests-firefox-3-6-chrome-4-opera-10-5-and-extensions/#comment-3348</guid>
		<description>Chrome 4 has bookmark synchronising built in, but imagine that&#039;s only useful if you are using Chrome at home and work...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chrome 4 has bookmark synchronising built in, but imagine that&#8217;s only useful if you are using Chrome at home and work&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chris</title>
		<link>http://www.s8080blog.com/2010/01/considering-a-new-browser-browser-speed-tests-firefox-3-6-chrome-4-opera-10-5-and-extensions/comment-page-1/#comment-3347</link>
		<dc:creator>chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 13:50:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.s8080blog.com/2010/01/considering-a-new-browser-browser-speed-tests-firefox-3-6-chrome-4-opera-10-5-and-extensions/#comment-3347</guid>
		<description>Cheers Iestyn,
That graphic is pretty amazing once I got my head around how it worked!
Now XMarks is available for Chrome, I think I am about ready to move over on my home box.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cheers Iestyn,<br />
That graphic is pretty amazing once I got my head around how it worked!<br />
Now XMarks is available for Chrome, I think I am about ready to move over on my home box.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Iestyn Pugh</title>
		<link>http://www.s8080blog.com/2010/01/considering-a-new-browser-browser-speed-tests-firefox-3-6-chrome-4-opera-10-5-and-extensions/comment-page-1/#comment-3346</link>
		<dc:creator>Iestyn Pugh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 13:45:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.s8080blog.com/2010/01/considering-a-new-browser-browser-speed-tests-firefox-3-6-chrome-4-opera-10-5-and-extensions/#comment-3346</guid>
		<description>Chrome 4 and Firefox 3.6 are significantly faster for web browsing than their predecessors so would definitely recommend upgrading (and of course for security reasons!) For me though, Chrome is a tiny bit faster...

Interesting graphic with browser use stats from Jan 02 to Aug 09: http://www.michaelvandaniker.com/labs/browserVisualization/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chrome 4 and Firefox 3.6 are significantly faster for web browsing than their predecessors so would definitely recommend upgrading (and of course for security reasons!) For me though, Chrome is a tiny bit faster&#8230;</p>
<p>Interesting graphic with browser use stats from Jan 02 to Aug 09: <a href="http://www.michaelvandaniker.com/labs/browserVisualization/" rel="nofollow">http://www.michaelvandaniker.com/labs/browserVisualization/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
