<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Web Accessibility</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.s8080blog.com/2009/11/web-accessibility/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.s8080blog.com/2009/11/web-accessibility/</link>
	<description>Some of our latest digital releases.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 16:39:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jordan Clark</title>
		<link>http://www.s8080blog.com/2009/11/web-accessibility/comment-page-1/#comment-3333</link>
		<dc:creator>Jordan Clark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 23:35:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.s8080blog.com/?p=864#comment-3333</guid>
		<description>Thanks for bringing this resource to my attention - it&#039;s got some really useful information on web accessibility.

Also, I agree about the new W3C website redesign - it&#039;s much more easier on the eyes than the previous version was; and I find it a lot more digestible than the original. The only &quot;problem&quot; is that when it comes to the site&#039;s CSS, the W3C are guilty of ignoring their own recommendations. I think that they should of at least made the CSS validate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for bringing this resource to my attention &#8211; it&#8217;s got some really useful information on web accessibility.</p>
<p>Also, I agree about the new W3C website redesign &#8211; it&#8217;s much more easier on the eyes than the previous version was; and I find it a lot more digestible than the original. The only &#8220;problem&#8221; is that when it comes to the site&#8217;s CSS, the W3C are guilty of ignoring their own recommendations. I think that they should of at least made the CSS validate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
